A POLST is a direct threat to anyone with a chronic disability, and represent the leading edge of the medical community's resurgent notions of the uselessness of people with chronic disabilities. The fact that they are useful in some contexts doesn't in any way eliminate their potential for deadly judgements on the quality of life of people with severe disabilities. You should also take a look at the pamphlets big box hospitals provide freely to convince you to sign advance directives. They include fairly competent attempts to convince you your life isn't worth living.
And don't forget the woman who recently woke up to find an operating team getting ready to remove her organs. See http://goo.gl/sNYzV
http://goo.gl/rpI7nP
“'How do we know the POLST medical order actually reflects the desires of the individual?' [We worry] that depending on how POLSTs are presented, they can make life-sustaining treatments—such as the use of feeding tubes—seem unbearable, even though many disabled people are able to live full lives because of them."
In her more extensive written comments, Coleman called attention to documented evidence of problems from various states that have implemented POLST, including a Delaware state order discontinuing the use of POLST, and a February 2013 report from Disability Rights California entitled, The Deadly Failure of a Hospital to Follow a Patient's Decisions About his Medical Care.
Coleman also addressed POLST provisions contained in a new federal bill called the “Personalize Your Care Act” that was introduced on March 14, 2013, by Representative Earl Blumenauer (D-Oregon):
"[The bill] would provide Medicare funding for physicians to have a conversation with their patients about “end-of-life care.” If done well, we agree that such a conversation can be a good thing, and I object to the 'death panel' accusations that obstructed rational discussion of such a provision in the Affordable Care Act.
"But there’s another section of the new bill, H.R. 1173, that would provide grants to promote POLST across the country. If we can conclude anything from the current level of information we have about how POLST is being implemented in the states that have it, it’s that many questions remain unanswered, strong reasons for concern exist, and federal funding to promote POLST is premature. The POLST provisions of H.R. 1173 should be amended to fund independent research to answer the serious questions and concerns that many have raised. That’s what the Institute of Medicine and this Committee should support."